From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2CC71FF16E for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C5B2B1AD; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:55 +0100 (CET) To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:31:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Post: From: Lou Lecrivain via pve-devel Precedence: list Cc: Lou Lecrivain X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: Subject: [pve-devel] SPAM: [PATCH pve-network v2 0/4] dhcp: always generate dhcp-range Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5276018159276458799==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" --===============5276018159276458799== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09CC7C1840 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E02F987 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp-79.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([176.139.8.107]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id KbztttRjtOL3hKbzttpFle; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:32:18 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.fr; s=t20230301; t=1733743938; bh=TpvsodsThHTI9wwZHWCWxHcWl4jcLgJsRuneOLm8TO4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=SWyRSw7G4d+Ok77QS3UKxxhITymRl1ya2Ry+/xzkth4q9TFgySfL+Hg+a7q5emDu0 bokjXadPKHASJSiEwqEvt8/q48CWr7fsKdIOkNr+ghBCN1gp127Qvb+9Ad5iViMlST GsR6AP5PmcJxscPZ3ZsjJgGcA8zKpUkTBTeZegqqHellPZE4sFfYL6gqp2lDkiFhD+ ZtiYhWnv53puHZDL49ymapOR1zV2cyguKkz/pKjkLjWEwxog5P1+VtIBXI8m23p4Y7 beF3/5STGjpF4O59tWnu+fg4YEUDAvxYVXZ0XhgfENZZL6tww5EHfslw/+FRkzvomI 3SZBtSd61+asQ== X-ME-Helo: localhost X-ME-Auth: bG91LmxlY3JpdmFpbkBvcmFuZ2UuZnI= X-ME-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:32:18 +0100 X-ME-IP: 176.139.8.107 From: Lou Lecrivain To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com subject: SPAM: [PATCH pve-network v2 0/4] dhcp: always generate dhcp-range Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:31:54 +0100 Message-Id: <20241209113158.7343-1-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 4 AWL -0.113 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_REJECT 0.1 DMARC reject policy FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 0.001 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.249 From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different KAM_DMARC_REJECT 6 DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has a DMARC reject policy RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 -0.01 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL -0.01 Mailspike good senders RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Second version of the patch, changes made as seen with Stefan. this patch series re-enables a previously disabled code path in order to allow IP allocation directly from a prefix when no DHCP ranges are configured for a subnet. MfG -- Lou Lecrivain WDZ GmbH Lou Lecrivain (4): vnet: do not skip if no range is defined, ask for allocation inside prefix instead dhcp: always generate dhcp-range for dnsmasq fix: register details in pve ipam db for add_next_freeip update tests following changes to behaviour: - allocating IPs also when prefix-only - PVE IPAM register details for every allocation strategy src/PVE/Network/SDN/Dhcp.pm | 3 ++- src/PVE/Network/SDN/Dhcp/Dnsmasq.pm | 23 ++++++++++------------- src/PVE/Network/SDN/Ipams/PVEPlugin.pm | 6 +++++- src/PVE/Network/SDN/Vnets.pm | 3 +-- src/test/run_test_subnets.pl | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++--- src/test/run_test_vnets_blackbox.pl | 6 ++---- 6 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) -- 2.39.5 --===============5276018159276458799== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============5276018159276458799==--