From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A49861FF16E for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D5797D0; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:26 +0100 (CET) To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:31:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20241209113158.7343-1-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de> References: <20241209113158.7343-1-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Post: From: Lou Lecrivain via pve-devel Precedence: list Cc: Lou Lecrivain X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: Subject: [pve-devel] SPAM: [PATCH pve-network v2 1/4] vnet: do not skip if no range is defined, ask for allocation inside prefix instead Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0222064180425062371==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" --===============0222064180425062371== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B309CC1839 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 944E8103 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp-20.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:32:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([176.139.8.107]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id Kbzuti9wtixoAKbzutIwcp; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:32:19 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.fr; s=t20230301; t=1733743939; bh=WgDeqmwcFWbxJxOsEIg4bhnUZVOfzmborOrtaEj/oCw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=SGXiz3WefICLUeNFUOGOHgtcwR8llWOs398anYDRJKYChZo4MxiEjZnJvTahUKna+ s8Ou284RQmH2WLuyc2X+k9LtTLerLdd2K4Zo2TcqG8beXE5lSiRqRoFXo3uVaN1ZVz A++6Bwlrag4yfj3AO1qmGGDQcW96OsnaUKD/SsuDnS04qAaXGw5l+/HmKUnWCCNgYo YFg2wMjrw8AuTnSL6IezeT2QaBhZ2MsT3bf7yQsFBRWTdyshIg+G9fEBhpRHmZ3YbT d5tUA0UTqr4+sQo8pb/ikurZ+xUvAGzfIRuSAo1MLo58+jXZ72M5Z4ZZiDjoCFWh6c 4uPFEeCSZUnWQ== X-ME-Helo: localhost X-ME-Auth: bG91LmxlY3JpdmFpbkBvcmFuZ2UuZnI= X-ME-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:32:19 +0100 X-ME-IP: 176.139.8.107 From: Lou Lecrivain To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com subject: SPAM: [PATCH pve-network v2 1/4] vnet: do not skip if no range is defined, ask for allocation inside prefix instead Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 12:31:55 +0100 Message-Id: <20241209113158.7343-2-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20241209113158.7343-1-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de> References: <20241209113158.7343-1-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 4 AWL -0.108 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_REJECT 0.1 DMARC reject policy FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 0.001 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.249 From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different KAM_DMARC_REJECT 6 DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has a DMARC reject policy RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 -0.01 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL -0.01 Mailspike good senders SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Signed-off-by: lou lecrivain --- src/PVE/Network/SDN/Vnets.pm | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Vnets.pm b/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Vnets.pm index 45292e3..4e795f2 100644 --- a/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Vnets.pm +++ b/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Vnets.pm @@ -118,11 +118,10 @@ sub add_next_free_cidr { my $network = $subnet->{network}; next if Net::IP::ip_get_version($network) != $ipversion || $ips->{$ipversion}; - next if !$subnet->{'dhcp-range'}; $subnetcount++; eval { - $ip = PVE::Network::SDN::Subnets::add_next_free_ip($zone, $subnetid, $subnet, $hostname, $mac, $vmid, $skipdns, $dhcprange); + $ip = PVE::Network::SDN::Subnets::add_next_free_ip($zone, $subnetid, $subnet, $hostname, $mac, $vmid, $skipdns, $subnet->{'dhcp-range'}); }; die $@ if $@; -- 2.39.5 --===============0222064180425062371== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============0222064180425062371==--