From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1873D1FF16B
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:10:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6FA93B60A;
	Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:10:26 +0100 (CET)
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:09:40 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <mailman.831.1732813825.391.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
From: Lou Lecrivain via pve-devel <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Precedence: list
Cc: Lou Lecrivain <lou.lecrivain@wdz.de>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
Subject: [pve-devel] SPAM: [PATCH pve-network 0/2] fix #5949
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2936291326398819638=="
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

--===============2936291326398819638==
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <lou.lecrivain@orange.fr>
X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EDBDCB45A
	for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:10:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 10E8BB4EE
	for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:09:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp-13.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
	for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:09:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([176.139.8.107])
	by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA
	id Gi1StLbVNzORiGi1TtKmWa; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:09:47 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.fr;
	s=t20230301; t=1732813787;
	bh=joLxLZpR8h1qSpGtGnsJUI+xk768exMuA81x2nkchTc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version;
	b=KXVJJE1IqFcqpVlt7RVRV9CzvdOfLHgeEdO92aeHII6R5UZA3fPc+BTABC8EGImCS
	 e3ZPu5w9ml1kTtYdiCz4V2EfTDyOE6xsrcfBNQHIGxbk7GN33JST1Abmn+3HjSSwz6
	 bphnHfwZBxVmQe8BCMEpGcsK23A7kW57xFVMPNrqH3oJsxw1OjK7kI9lHT01o674Sd
	 U50faec/4nmZjkQCTozBlVSHWnhAnXKnFH+oksPzauNyybixpfPgv9eRq5AO9GwPB8
	 4WLtXiSDomU6Lgaa0vav8XlXuFPk/cIhSvLYQojD5zhBDtcLNcvguuDt+O24ZlSFpH
	 isAwCb2uFrfbA==
X-ME-Helo: localhost
X-ME-Auth: bG91LmxlY3JpdmFpbkBvcmFuZ2UuZnI=
X-ME-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:09:47 +0100
X-ME-IP: 176.139.8.107
From: Lou Lecrivain <lou.lecrivain@wdz.de>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
subject: SPAM: [PATCH pve-network 0/2] fix #5949
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:09:40 +0100
Message-Id: <20241128170942.4717-1-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  4
	AWL                    -0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
	DKIM_VALID               -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	DKIM_VALID_EF            -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain
	DMARC_REJECT              0.1 DMARC reject policy
	FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN  0.001 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
	FREEMAIL_FROM           0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS  0.001 From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different
	KAM_DMARC_REJECT            6 DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has a DMARC reject policy
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4       0.001 Very Good reputation (+4)
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL       0.001 Mailspike good senders
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	SPF_HELO_PASS          -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record

this patch series re-enables a previously disabled code path in order to
allow IP allocation directly from a prefix when no DHCP ranges
are configured for a subnet.

2nd commit is a workaround for dnsmasq crash when a dhcp lease is
updated via dbus and no dhcp-range is configured.

The whole patch series requires #5946 patch to work.

MfG
--
Lou Lecrivain
WDZ GmbH

Lou Lecrivain (2):
  vnet: do not skip if no range is defined, ask for allocation inside
    prefix instead
  dhcp: generate dhcp-range for dnsmasq even when no dhcp_ranges exist

 src/PVE/Network/SDN/Dhcp.pm         | 6 ++++--
 src/PVE/Network/SDN/Dhcp/Dnsmasq.pm | 5 ++++-
 src/PVE/Network/SDN/Dhcp/Plugin.pm  | 2 +-
 src/PVE/Network/SDN/Vnets.pm        | 4 ++--
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.5



--===============2936291326398819638==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

--===============2936291326398819638==--