From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1873D1FF16B for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:10:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6FA93B60A; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:10:26 +0100 (CET) To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:09:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Post: From: Lou Lecrivain via pve-devel Precedence: list Cc: Lou Lecrivain X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: Subject: [pve-devel] SPAM: [PATCH pve-network 0/2] fix #5949 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2936291326398819638==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" --===============2936291326398819638== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EDBDCB45A for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:10:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 10E8BB4EE for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:09:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp-13.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:09:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([176.139.8.107]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id Gi1StLbVNzORiGi1TtKmWa; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:09:47 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.fr; s=t20230301; t=1732813787; bh=joLxLZpR8h1qSpGtGnsJUI+xk768exMuA81x2nkchTc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=KXVJJE1IqFcqpVlt7RVRV9CzvdOfLHgeEdO92aeHII6R5UZA3fPc+BTABC8EGImCS e3ZPu5w9ml1kTtYdiCz4V2EfTDyOE6xsrcfBNQHIGxbk7GN33JST1Abmn+3HjSSwz6 bphnHfwZBxVmQe8BCMEpGcsK23A7kW57xFVMPNrqH3oJsxw1OjK7kI9lHT01o674Sd U50faec/4nmZjkQCTozBlVSHWnhAnXKnFH+oksPzauNyybixpfPgv9eRq5AO9GwPB8 4WLtXiSDomU6Lgaa0vav8XlXuFPk/cIhSvLYQojD5zhBDtcLNcvguuDt+O24ZlSFpH isAwCb2uFrfbA== X-ME-Helo: localhost X-ME-Auth: bG91LmxlY3JpdmFpbkBvcmFuZ2UuZnI= X-ME-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:09:47 +0100 X-ME-IP: 176.139.8.107 From: Lou Lecrivain To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com subject: SPAM: [PATCH pve-network 0/2] fix #5949 Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:09:40 +0100 Message-Id: <20241128170942.4717-1-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 4 AWL -0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_REJECT 0.1 DMARC reject policy FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 0.001 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.001 From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different KAM_DMARC_REJECT 6 DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has a DMARC reject policy RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 0.001 Very Good reputation (+4) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record this patch series re-enables a previously disabled code path in order to allow IP allocation directly from a prefix when no DHCP ranges are configured for a subnet. 2nd commit is a workaround for dnsmasq crash when a dhcp lease is updated via dbus and no dhcp-range is configured. The whole patch series requires #5946 patch to work. MfG -- Lou Lecrivain WDZ GmbH Lou Lecrivain (2): vnet: do not skip if no range is defined, ask for allocation inside prefix instead dhcp: generate dhcp-range for dnsmasq even when no dhcp_ranges exist src/PVE/Network/SDN/Dhcp.pm | 6 ++++-- src/PVE/Network/SDN/Dhcp/Dnsmasq.pm | 5 ++++- src/PVE/Network/SDN/Dhcp/Plugin.pm | 2 +- src/PVE/Network/SDN/Vnets.pm | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.39.5 --===============2936291326398819638== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============2936291326398819638==--