From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 158B81FF162
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:42:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A606C3CD6F;
Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:42:30 +0200 (CEST)
References: <20250404162908.563060-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
<20250404162908.563060-26-g.goller@proxmox.com>
<9c5f591e-bf2d-4c99-ad28-02ee58bbc222@proxmox.com>
<1744010542.6a4j1ll8ij.astroid@yuna.none>
<ec1776b0-1a8b-45fd-bbf5-d3c96b90016b@proxmox.com>
<50c0c55b-834c-4f73-b046-898584a075d5@proxmox.com>
<dfbc849d-ac72-4dfb-89d5-b36a24ab71cc@proxmox.com>
<a303e4d1-a118-4b81-a177-9c4c8b3fff3d@proxmox.com>
<a3d7a9fb-8029-4cc1-b195-b323a6013943@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <a3d7a9fb-8029-4cc1-b195-b323a6013943@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:41:43 -0300
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <mailman.772.1744026149.359.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
From: Gilberto Ferreira via pve-devel <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Precedence: list
Cc: Gilberto Ferreira <gilberto.nunes32@gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-access-control v2 1/1] permissions: add
ACL paths for SDN fabrics
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7113670469018604155=="
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
--===============7113670469018604155==
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-Path: <gilberto.nunes32@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F778D1F96
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:42:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 608593CC7F
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:42:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:42:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-307325f2436so44505061fa.0
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2025 04:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1744026140; x=1744630940; darn=lists.proxmox.com;
h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=msdDNl/ilSictfG7yAeX4eHnRzANMkC6ai64sVT3hF8=;
b=eSZouqkxoFNC49ztTn7CgO4+ggJpJiuocZxjpeuGzOAhseTcp3txoW5++gBIgz94xa
YGSZ8+i0ebJchvibM6SSBCTmKJlZ1cS/qheFTXQ9Sor4kw2qpt1XpshSrQhVij+mFk1E
YwVps404TiHbfldidSk10rso/8bdaEfLIFHeWhFWqUkud+6LbbPOuTrQ/QxRzLgxZ8qX
kTeoYj7QP/mOgWRMqYugg1r/mUIRoyvO8BpnFBahGwjxourq3sgRO30ECSsIocWLO0Js
jvz1FkEGpUPc7DHUUONH1JrbjJOK7wo1AyNWR0hY5PeaZUzBfV8KsbR1db2H1GFprmRD
vs+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1744026140; x=1744630940;
h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to;
bh=msdDNl/ilSictfG7yAeX4eHnRzANMkC6ai64sVT3hF8=;
b=hhJxUtZ+z/TJ6VzcVmcQ0nCFoPYuGSazNW0/449hSwEYDHzuoU0aEofxc1A4rDmsBa
u4S0b/Ui8DU0rZBSVd8OtkmhTUlTrTqDr86v+cW0f4bOrk/w2HMTSnV3ChlgZmJRoYgq
6wjDUog66TfpTqSNkd/Qw8nxa139UTGrcju12toYlzWBkYio07+WYe07shz2NkqFXJJF
BkdDO6BoWz1d1kYGQdB7p1xybwWa8jykKUfmh51RxhRR2TczskIyqa5qoW5RDlY0pSBQ
+uTkazREzTy59DGSu+k6qeq+1wTdgn020Lt1irVdXb8s8Yjk573qT7SyFQCQ5UYyU8Zb
NT+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywj2ppt0c+NDKy/rBdl3M+Z020xn6NdGRM/ItnF7ol6chfzdZFf
ej54a8r08JixTv1QZi+53C32bRf3Il24MCL3kJog8POVWBRW0Vihtpems2oXDnx2czdvnr/ctmO
cP+b90x6GLUZsspw7XPivBveOE0JVdLEw
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvI/ryKfs7VyJFtuk6E+PXZQ61G/G3S8k2BCIg0LuOZGOU5nS9HWjpgbOk2/Wt
j7ieD/kQUQo9LK2icXBe7izxEn6AOwOPar1sKJUOWbvX0Sz7/UyCyHgcjJtTbaZlJQ43y+Q79ka
15DslhC8J+q19Lhx2qjaJnzIBtTcJr33Sxah2Iu7YktXv0bz1bHQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE/VberHOrS+aUcnBJs/zkDKx2EBnhoArnfR3udpZAb4vomwWFhdjLjRBZaFf4yEENOcNRbnuCkg/r4+gaE1jo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:19ac:b0:30d:7c85:14f5 with SMTP id
38308e7fff4ca-30f0c03c132mr35834111fa.25.1744026140281; Mon, 07 Apr 2025
04:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20250404162908.563060-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> <20250404162908.563060-26-g.goller@proxmox.com>
<9c5f591e-bf2d-4c99-ad28-02ee58bbc222@proxmox.com> <1744010542.6a4j1ll8ij.astroid@yuna.none>
<ec1776b0-1a8b-45fd-bbf5-d3c96b90016b@proxmox.com> <50c0c55b-834c-4f73-b046-898584a075d5@proxmox.com>
<dfbc849d-ac72-4dfb-89d5-b36a24ab71cc@proxmox.com> <a303e4d1-a118-4b81-a177-9c4c8b3fff3d@proxmox.com>
<a3d7a9fb-8029-4cc1-b195-b323a6013943@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <a3d7a9fb-8029-4cc1-b195-b323a6013943@proxmox.com>
From: Gilberto Ferreira <gilberto.nunes32@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:41:43 -0300
X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUEPb6buNZmCtU0k3e5-cuWLs6cq-kqa67HehC8n5-o30DkC7NveZwHF_Cs
Message-ID: <CAOKSTBsu8vrw8_nSu_LozwNwTc+ReTb6TEg3K_iM8uYh9oRRFg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-access-control v2 1/1] permissions: add
ACL paths for SDN fabrics
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.061 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain
DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain
DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy
FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT 0.25 Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit
FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message
POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
Hi there.
Sorry if I disrupt this thread in any way, but I need to know if this patch
series has something to do with frr services?
Currently, I am using Full Mesh Network for a customer, with 3 servers.
Sometimes, using SDN messes up with the configuration.
So, this patch has the goal to optimize the use of SDN combined with FRR
services?
Cheers
---
Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
(47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram
Em seg., 7 de abr. de 2025 =C3=A0s 07:13, Thomas Lamprecht <
t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> escreveu:
> Am 07.04.25 um 12:08 schrieb Stefan Hanreich:
> > Yes, I agree that we shouldn't rush this. I've thought about this
> > extensively today (and the weekend for that matter) and wanted to talk
> > to you about it today anyway.
> >
> > After some consideration I strongly drifted towards not including it.
> > While I think this is functionally in a decent shape and I *really*
> > wanted to get this ready, I think we should take more time to carefully
> > consider and evaluate the underlying design. This is a fundamental
> > building block - particularly looking at further PDM integrations, so w=
e
> > need to make sure to get this right. I don't think we can manage to do
> > this properly in a timely fashion, and I don't think this patch series
> > received the scrutiny it should given the importance and size.
>
>
> Alright, thanks for your input here; I'll then hold-off from considering
> this series for the time being, but let's definitively take a closer and
> calmer look after the releases.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
>
--===============7113670469018604155==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
--===============7113670469018604155==--