From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE5B11FF165 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:39:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8F724187D6; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:39:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:34:05 +0200 References: In-Reply-To: To: Proxmox VE development discussion MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Post: From: Roland privat via pve-devel Precedence: list Cc: Roland privat X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH SERIES v2 pve-storage/qemu-server] add external qcow2 snapshot support Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2606809198904240114==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" --===============2606809198904240114== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACE23C6E2C for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:39:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8B4701881A for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:39:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:39:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1729445972; x=1730050772; i=devzero@web.de; bh=ZQ9M99mj/CsryJE4SsHBNxfcBX69cAQYQy8a6A4BjCs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From: Mime-Version:Subject:Date:Message-Id:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To: cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id: mime-version:reply-to:subject:to; b=EI85fspR8RJcSORkUMwKj5W/y5D1xUnaWmWA54qOikf846B605vUp8NGBLlRnAjd eCxLLy51+/aa6jBqNVFp2QgHCQPZmQsY+b2NYxDn1vDT+elwWVu+ieZEpi/e6I12J LE6t+D7kWvd0Lual1eraYbK/sugL6gXBrRnb6bGsvBz9xzpylUkLNjE1kS7Inogdl fgLIqIycJUHsKQ2clV0/W/RvvYjs4KLMJybTgbnWbxVrDdK3N00OJgQtER95TjWJ5 HWVXd64UPsRGoj5KuzQvoCW3ZPtDofyuxfbDuE4q4la55l92UTI2W0XPdJh7K1+BJ +YH1COhgxfLNIcsH5g== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from smtpclient.apple ([80.187.120.40]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb005 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MLARS-1tKnBy2PKM-00IFO9; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:34:16 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Roland privat Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH SERIES v2 pve-storage/qemu-server] add external qcow2 snapshot support Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:34:05 +0200 Message-Id: <4A4D6F36-75C7-4346-BA43-EED2DD7B3F70@web.de> References: In-Reply-To: To: Proxmox VE development discussion X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21G93) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:gYHUBkeSsjFvHjy70MIYPX435JeuSJZ5i61m4eCjTKshNF9Q33s EUpH5Cy2Djz5v8U5ZCYlNypc77APpXKEwfM2ykNja0YHS40MSqXx243hXDV2snsntZThMC6 pDxM2zmhkrBO8gDbWlZ+CZsFK1r3wQFmLmHwUmqFoYEVXpYX0A3bm0+BqxLVyQGjlsqciYS iVhUi/3XSA8+r4teOvehw== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:EiHHb7sVoLE=;OKQ5QNloYhZJjvKleg+UwjfTuVJ h+aJu1VBnpkT4sZ1rF0ju0HL9l/LPy4gD1QhejGggBVXmdTsgkdp35hWSVOdENvAHglHiOePr xLxMw9IEf+MZ6MFUx/NIEOKLi2imtcTWwiZLfdUqzt8hNeAkwvrjjbH0tbia6z7kOp/crWxo0 PDBfXiBKS89Kqin3R2LixRZaUdpnISOGS1uPoAdDGCMLax5BgyL0xWtLWo9onUKbpqoicnfdW Cth/W5tpVBm+Dp7hpUH5i+l6JB48MedAj7mFmZB9f1ce4F7SRC+JR6IxZFBY0rUGN+nxd+YQi VTzrPM01lqI2L0o7avsa9NQEgLy4RkXiAOxPjMMDP+qp+A9kF6mIDU9xl1vpQROeNIopjbFze U4Us75+5/gcDT+poiXMps3k1Nl4IMES1qScP5yWPoIwc/1T2JKgT/fww7bB1mOjfTi9vl8ymh 32Ta56xloAywmyCIT/RlKh6/jpGDMhSj3cOLZgFfU1409cQ8DGOetUqS8Ow7lgWkFJ/z82zTa fOH6zU1Z0uK+h8/YB3hQpmIQVTSLYWTYFHvKRJeNX4axl0v5XxpGvd5A6I2233Bx7s/RmSKwM 4MUuaJXYk96afTd7Si2KYDQ1yNz9AJH1n0FDBrRV8/xMIQo+SxN1StqwBgtKOTieyU3pXrCwB 6Pb7sCG8Xh9myJKbYfqU2+n7VFdoRrsYG9+XvbOxiuoHTbuu1NL+Eu0YUoQEgU8uXC3HWwOPu 9b3q3U29Bwuj0IZxftOts/NmwJOzu1229rBYeueeWd/wwJEG+TXNIK9+aQGcegT5qfQ1LwwPa LL2Fprs1SqN4MZ/JHWEqS3Fw== X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.999 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 Good reputation (+3) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL 0.001 Mailspike good senders RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record i never understood, why qemu has inline snapshot by default. from an admin= perspective it simply sucks. for example you won=E2=80=98t know when some= thing goes wrong on removal, how much orphaned data is being left. further= more, the freezes on removal are a pita for us and we often avoid live snap= shot removal because of this. this is one of the reasons why i think , pro= xmox isn=E2=80=98t on the same enterprise level like vmware. so, i strongly vote for inclusion of this feature and will happily test it,= when available regards roland > Am 20.10.2024 um 15:04 schrieb DERUMIER, Alexandre via pve-devel : >=20 > =EF=BB=BF > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============2606809198904240114== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============2606809198904240114==--