From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D011FF15F for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:00:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D50CE10E73; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:00:45 +0200 (CEST) To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:00:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20240826110030.1744732-1-alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com> References: <20240826110030.1744732-1-alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Post: From: Alexandre Derumier via pve-devel Precedence: list Cc: Alexandre Derumier X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 5/6] qemu_img_format: lvmqcow2 is a path_storage Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0174594452431840431==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" --===============0174594452431840431== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33273C68C4 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:00:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 13BF910CF4 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:00:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bastiontest.odiso.net (unknown [IPv6:2a0a:1580:2000:6700::14]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:00:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from formationkvm1.odiso.net (unknown [10.11.201.57]) by bastiontest.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553A781F57E; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:00:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by formationkvm1.odiso.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id 28100102034B; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:00:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexandre Derumier To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Subject: [PATCH qemu-server 5/6] qemu_img_format: lvmqcow2 is a path_storage Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:00:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20240826110030.1744732-12-alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240826110030.1744732-1-alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com> References: <20240826110030.1744732-1-alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 1 AWL -0.931 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_NONE 0.1 DMARC none policy HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.249 From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different KAM_DMARC_NONE 0.25 DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has no DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1 Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery methods RDNS_NONE 0.793 Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record SUBJ_LACKS_WORDS 1.892 Subject is not short yet lacks words T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - needed for snapshot Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier --- PVE/QemuServer.pm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm index fb67ac9..a6a40cd 100644 --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm @@ -7922,7 +7922,7 @@ sub qemu_img_format { # FIXME: this entire function is kind of weird given that `parse_volname` # also already gives us a format? - my $is_path_storage = $scfg->{path} || $scfg->{type} eq 'esxi'; + my $is_path_storage = $scfg->{path} || $scfg->{type} eq 'esxi' || $scfg->{type} eq 'lvmqcow2'; if ($is_path_storage && $volname =~ m/\.($PVE::QemuServer::Drive::QEMU_FORMAT_RE)$/) { return $1; -- 2.39.2 --===============0174594452431840431== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============0174594452431840431==--