From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1F91FF394 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:43:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B77721DE0B; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:44:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:43:26 +0200 To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20240419124556.3334691-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <954884c6-3a53-4b3a-bdc8-93478037b6a6@binovo.es> In-Reply-To: <954884c6-3a53-4b3a-bdc8-93478037b6a6@binovo.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Post: From: Eneko Lacunza via pve-devel Precedence: list Cc: Eneko Lacunza X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH guest-common/qemu-server/manager/docs v3 0/4] implement experimental vgpu live migration Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1673415358268603463==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" --===============1673415358268603463== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E96F4C765A for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:44:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D1D901DD26 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:43:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:43:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2eaadde4dafso1319351fa.3 for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 01:43:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=binovo.es; s=google; t=1717404208; x=1718009008; darn=lists.proxmox.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :to:from:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oUAVyVMTDj+ebqRnme7S5DOgYqX2y/0uizYDZsWG1dQ=; b=RbwU1DxFyQcWnneuwYy7WYzVhGjThNApTqj1vc0SNkA7AO2k/u/0rXNa8X0+MnjhSn DNDvt6ea93ZAAK78u4Qel6P/yigSY41fZ1z0Kv0AjH2lu2xmvCndS4un5m/NAQ+LvNeE opUoQerojDyyvy8Na1Jska9ZoCL58w2IrDV9/rkqzWB6ADaqHcNMp7HABA/hjbmV6QfZ xbkb3qWwOuwlzXF0mBdG0CrgLUpaDKCiSFHYv9++ZMt6GAwvboX2qS+AUxp1P+PZIQl8 iiYLce5nTIOBJGlMB9hIHSOIceOdzZkAgNzff4I1Hlgn/NwMf11n+ZO1f9ccNGEtZpTt /nhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717404208; x=1718009008; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :to:from:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oUAVyVMTDj+ebqRnme7S5DOgYqX2y/0uizYDZsWG1dQ=; b=ST6ElXfMAMtMV23Nph+UG2GwutMU981Mn3UEU3o2adSQXhvFrnGONdN6sftIPFWsfl v8xaZHiFwDQThqBRO3Ixkn8jAj2zCk2RcclwhivMj3FPVuesfG8HNx5tXGvR/aRrH03k NbaXVJkdcnmE5bEwKwVZpZ7whcKSS2wubYmvRNkErUAhu+yzs5acWaPMq+psNrkR2klY I74oQYYTWSToYK/mEBfBCJg/ypyFYd5WMXt5deuxD3rP670eqxolod66sRxAdhmlOiC+ HoYxM3iTC8LEiUA91+suia9P4bTM0fmgBgk+itLqxXqyawI42/EIKackVbeXI7ZNg9Nr mrRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwRwgMJUAtjNUt+uyTVwf9dT2yEozL5XNwrbm8Ub1yelJ7UEOVl mDIeeghrWXWvob8iA86a8hOYLiivTtU2qF/NbABjBE13i+/hH98L3155iM1bEUPKGLMHaBZpOM8 = X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGRkV5XrDmAh3HI/EYeZY2SVzZtAvnA650hAvUdCaN7GolBsPAV0eJHgyWB2AATwtLTa7nqfA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8ec3:0:b0:2ea:8f57:bd58 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ea951cbbafmr50960171fa.3.1717404208241; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 01:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.29.37.147] (249.red-213-96-132.staticip.rima-tde.net. [213.96.132.249]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-35dd064ca96sm8122191f8f.107.2024.06.03.01.43.27 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Jun 2024 01:43:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:43:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH guest-common/qemu-server/manager/docs v3 0/4] implement experimental vgpu live migration From: Eneko Lacunza To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20240419124556.3334691-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <954884c6-3a53-4b3a-bdc8-93478037b6a6@binovo.es> Content-Language: es-CO In-Reply-To: <954884c6-3a53-4b3a-bdc8-93478037b6a6@binovo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.130 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Hi, Sorry for the noise, the issue I described is already resolved. For other users convenience: At datacenter->Resource mappings a mapping has to be created for nvidia mediated devices. Then at VM hardware, PCI device can be added as mapped device, which is assigned to first free mdev on host. Thanks El 31/5/24 a las 10:11, Eneko Lacunza escribió: > > Hi Dominik, > > > El 28/5/24 a las 9:25, Dominik Csapak escribió: >> ping? >> >> i know we cannot really test this atm but there are a few >> users/customers >> that would like to use/test this >> >> since i marked it experimental i think it should be ok to include this >> if its ok code wise >> > > Would this patch-series help in this scenario: > > - Running VM has a Nvidia mdev asigned in hw. > - We clone that VM. VM can't be started until we change the hw id to > another Nvidia mdev. > > If so, I have a potential customer that is looking to migrate a VDI > deployment from Nutanix to Proxmox. They're currently testing Proxmox > with one server with a Nvidia card, and can test this if packages are > prepared (in testing?). > > We deployed this Proxmox server yesterday, we used latest NVIDIA host > driver. Latest kernel 6.8 didn't work but latest 6.5 did (will report > exact versions when I get remote access). > > Thanks > > Eneko Lacunza > Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico > Binovo IT Human Project > > Tel. +34 943 569 206 | https://www.binovo.es > Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun > > https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO > https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/ > Eneko Lacunza Zuzendari teknikoa | Director técnico Binovo IT Human Project Tel. +34 943 569 206 | https://www.binovo.es Astigarragako Bidea, 2 - 2º izda. Oficina 10-11, 20180 Oiartzun https://www.youtube.com/user/CANALBINOVO https://www.linkedin.com/company/37269706/ --===============1673415358268603463== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============1673415358268603463==--