From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5949F1FF179 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:26:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2808745F2; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:27:00 +0100 (CET) To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:18:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20251029091811.2800592-1-alwin@antreich.com> References: <20251029091811.2800592-1-alwin@antreich.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Post: From: Alwin Antreich via pve-devel Precedence: list Cc: Alwin Antreich X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs v2 3/3] pveceph: link ceph configure section Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2400447916892489068==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" --===============2400447916892489068== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7689AD6221 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:26:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5664745C8 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:26:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx.antreich.com (mx.antreich.com [173.249.42.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:26:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx.antreich.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.antreich.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3BA1A760C87 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:18:28 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antreich.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:from:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to; s=2025; bh=sgeZAKsos64cvI7V6z0TRRGRJe2Swj04vWau/u339xM=; b= YTtkyCQdp9ZQm4bGiBRZHoB3XgIp7EhYMLSDjW0ng7bXH+dfwDs3Uu+IUDj3LL2q zNHFQeUe7Z+XfZEVINUXRm0hR7YfWhSAQb/Avi79NFsJzKZlKo0mq638qmnSJBuo fhO8Q4g6WEuvVc3CDPBYeAVSN64VMCoPOvTjjww5vjAm5CmONGqa/pgSmoZWJa3F MnwcbRA8DAJtf8v0rjQGJEVr9Ky8kYM10UO7Wa8i9ISqyIHgY/tvBN9+g8tw34QJ au5f2RCq21e9jr2ZLK5VMrS1rKruOVLISN6GBf3krk65MtM5dGbAY7Sor8ZjiuxK 5/7FcF+EVXOl2zgYywQRRw== From: Alwin Antreich To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Subject: [PATCH docs v2 3/3] pveceph: link ceph configure section Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:18:11 +0100 Message-Id: <20251029091811.2800592-3-alwin@antreich.com> In-Reply-To: <20251029091811.2800592-1-alwin@antreich.com> References: <20251029091811.2800592-1-alwin@antreich.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.076 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record to follow how ceph configuration is adjusted Signed-off-by: Alwin Antreich --- pveceph.adoc | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/pveceph.adoc b/pveceph.adoc index cefecad..0d6e9ec 100644 --- a/pveceph.adoc +++ b/pveceph.adoc @@ -136,8 +136,9 @@ during critical operations, such as recovery, rebalancing, or backfilling. That means you should avoid maxing out your available memory already on regular operation, but rather leave some headroom to cope with outages. -The current recommendation is to configure OSDs with at least **8 GiB of -memory** for good performance. The OSD daemon requires 4 GiB by default. +The current recommendation is to xref:pve_ceph_configuration[configure] OSDs +with at least **8 GiB of memory** for good performance. The OSD daemon requires +4 GiB by default. NOTE: Total memory consumption is primarily determined by the number of OSD daemons. However, for critical operations, all Ceph services may require -- 2.39.5 --===============2400447916892489068== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============2400447916892489068==--