From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7432F1FF187 for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 26 May 2025 16:31:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E3FDF34DC2; Mon, 26 May 2025 16:32:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 10:31:20 -0400 To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <mailman.34.1748269920.395.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> From: Andrei Perapiolkin via pve-devel <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Precedence: list Cc: Andrei Perapiolkin <andrei.perepiolkin@open-e.com> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> Subject: [pve-devel] Volume live migration concurrency Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4121555153341586440==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============4121555153341586440== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <andrei.perepiolkin@open-e.com> X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CA86C8DDF for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 26 May 2025 16:32:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 23BEF34D95 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 26 May 2025 16:31:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 26 May 2025 16:31:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=open-e.com; s=s1-ionos; t=1748269883; x=1748874683; i=andrei.perepiolkin@open-e.com; bh=W4SCMN4Z1uQZeJXlVyw1D/CaoeozBkpnS5pIjMvaeqc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Content-Type:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:From: Subject:To:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from: message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:to; b=RrIcLL78qH+pY5oXeNKJw0XvD2ZbJ1cp8W4DbKuKgwhoqsn+4g3r5X9JtgfSNAZg XUEoyLWqouXsFJWt0bTVwYNaurt1cH1mRxuiHy1r35UeQCLiWAJ2NT3aUIlObBPWO rzi7ONw2ukF5RvOm5tu1i1uluhqeep+hZ4OO3o4gvHqfFmGCwNJRMUI5Rv0YspiLF afspl0PaJrSxqhCa1NvpdYsT/idXlv2kJxVr0IPvC8XUjkcFHBE26jpMwJhhKhNG2 BzohjJrx70VB7TwxOsGdGKyui3/5yklRrfqTz7qq8Ce13uIQfMxHdqU1weo6yVcvv tn/X8oaHGUyJoJliaw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 55c96926-9e95-11ee-ae09-1f7a4046a0f6 Received: from [10.137.0.75] ([149.102.246.43]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue011 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MJEIl-1ue6Xx3DD9-00Yv7J for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 26 May 2025 16:31:22 +0200 Message-ID: <6f0ab1f6-2d3f-41e3-8750-2567eb5b947d@open-e.com> Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 10:31:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Andrei Perapiolkin <andrei.perepiolkin@open-e.com> Subject: Volume live migration concurrency To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:h09U0iU/HfI9ly3wYja3QitwZHVahi95QRwsSCna8WrITvrzSHq K9lXiMyyNpXKetPwhRTxGVw5JDGqLrAJxCIa9KNSb5GFbXr6PlAg0D+lQwzUeINvPyhO8Po V18gi7Trcfj8P1xwFovWPKlypL2yMSlPezxRTgocV/xPXdo1XecUtpky/NLJqCclSo8ZJke n1vLnC7Mn2iYXOPRHZpvA== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:i7slcezd780=;0oiWEw36b8CCDYU/gQcYalyDUK/ u1jD34RY7pSQi+LW6PK+IA/KInpbmqMudiE2IHTVGiIEDgk0ihwH2h8TWNndJ7AAhoQL5Oq5X Ihk359XdCb21N/84AGgKrt6Asmy/CUtf+XLMEz1Tmqc+I1OyVu4ZJnihcnzdkFNNKqPIi/OlH KH1dgrSceGfAhAh2HDuQ0wDWpLxkZCxEUDdHafolX72U0sKEclANYiP7227vWEqWEGPh3ZxYz i/EFZCcd28wI9SIoybdnHnvfHM42enz7H4zNs1y9mUoePzWzrEg+zjOXE2jkfpAPX4LsX8TO7 HDNgfruWEVuQ+UD1lcirm8B/LNzSrraPMQx2R3zOTnJAv/rLPy84F+RPwcWeVudnmjOPvsSnr AleVLzf8Mw9CnFr8gne7LpCegTczDPlIHXBfgnsvbgdr2SnD4cbeS0AGKtYViBMVcNlPbg1OU 4tRoQJjiS283TwB3ROr8dm1shoDI/qayQ8as+ROSOTFHsDcRnc6Dx8ypXffGZYXSFGwJT7LPC r9U32lW0UmcL8AObBrWksom5OBHC79VcbGGqgGCGbD8OAf6fvn4oB+Znx92VglWCDPlX/mSme 8DQ2gR9KtY+ZaCF5GrOTz+HAyzuQ+0l3edj+ggX+QkWe5OhBGMyIIp9SyuVBJenRWfOuPe9Jm RfoWhCIlGqtxxUwcP7B8USzx97d/ikRXzQhaLlefvzP+5dCLm4uHLk3TZRlSPsn1rOp2ZqQA2 ZgAZyqlfpDxAxpZO11qKZsaeX7st/R3FqZhcavwbPvwjb3n+8FMGA2S5WUHpc4RPOGI5ZBnve enBT++Jz96W7mbjSZBCHk/QU4O4sXb0nY8GBJmDlYAqdDUky4c1WyVF84nhYbLXpVD0HmxNwa S3dD0laohZKp0BZOWUpokFKQNl3042xSmVGWrQk7f5aSnOhmRtQmzjyU8DmWvDdeHRiyOieJ7 r4RLE8EXFG8VeBdzRnCZfOWcKwncZ7gp4W5m1noMDSZhq+DAlF9OxTkcSvJFRU8at9OVkV3xi 1d6uTeXiDmOgDabFajmeQxzleTVeo7Nx2MtJBFmqSLyOUvUxxwy81Yh9MvMlQ8JhkhLhsXGwU 8NjC9aLbeyKZShIHvwLi+xEl/Gq2j+Gmy+BXoz36801Mo3Us5AhnVoM/Eygf/dIo4tt3xNaI0 WRkqlr+ZDtJ/J7eFz5WluYLWXv/ZEDtq7QDzUG2AwMdEkjX38Bo8kdIpGB9hH/8/0AP0077ai 3ymfcNbq1D36DjeaHZ5nE1lBtei/gabcSf+dQ+Q9i70TH+H6XNIdSpcPaCyWLo3OdrBXOCbrG 3EZpDw+h/pmldYjfNSygXkU1xBKZmIMtmueliHMajgQxWHBaNzy855zaPD8kAncPMM8H3Emo+ iEx0hfMoeDEGfDZ/sMyLJ4QATaHPimKN9Mh02BLKthjLnMxJhjrCB3ZB5hoo4tmy4coaiZqB4 nUCjgJA== X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.355 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL 0.1 Meta: its spam POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 -1 Excellent reputation (+5) RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL -0.01 Mailspike good senders RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [open-e.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Hi Proxmox Community, I'm curious whether there are any standard or guidelines that govern the= =20 order in which the methods: /activate_volume, deactivate_volume, path/=20 are called during VM live migration. Assuming the storage plugin supports `live migration`: 1. Can/path/ be called before /activate_volume?/ 2. When /vm /migrates from/node1/ to/node2, /might /activate_volume/=20 on/node2/ be invoked before /deactivate_volume/ has completed on /node1? / 3. In the context of live migration: Will Proxmox skip calling=20 /deactivate_volume/ for snapshots that have already been activated?=20 Should the storage plugin explicitly deactivate all snapshots of a=20 volume during migration? Best regards, Andrei Perepiolkin --===============4121555153341586440== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============4121555153341586440==--