From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C64D11FF389 for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 14:11:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EC921B9F4; Wed, 22 May 2024 14:12:11 +0200 (CEST) To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 14:05:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Post: From: Daniel Krambrock via pve-devel Precedence: list Cc: Daniel Krambrock X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: Subject: [pve-devel] (no subject) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3790141731082634035==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" --===============3790141731082634035== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD8CC49B7 for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 14:12:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BC2B7B861 for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 14:11:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vhrz1173.hrz.uni-marburg.de (vhrz1173.HRZ.Uni-Marburg.DE [137.248.1.43]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 14:11:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vhrz1173.hrz.uni-marburg.de (vhrz1173.HRZ.Uni-Marburg.DE [137.248.1.43]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vhrz1865.HRZ.Uni-Marburg.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VkqlX6VddzygQ for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 14:06:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-marburg.de; s=dkim; t=1716379576; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to: references; bh=nAEyPjs++rd9xEwKNlZ7GYPnPElD1znhR+5hhdRSTBY=; b=aXCm2Y8B2EX6kJhAHMCh3yMzGVRGBL3gNATNYSWuiCB4ZLc6Vj9JCdcCbc+vH88U5vaS3Y CpfbAHJnUkTVfZ+o+gVjCbjkEfgz1o8Lj47g8GU4A0+gDXoKtH3F8Ql80PAugQke5y9Qhv SZejQE9HohxOs5AYKKbiLBbWPExiPvg= Authentication-Results: smtpd-out; dkim=none; spf=none (smtpd-out: domain of root@vhrz2211.hrz.uni-marburg.de has no SPF policy when checking 137.248.1.43) smtp.mailfrom=root@vhrz2211.hrz.uni-marburg.de Received: from vhrz2211.hrz.uni-marburg.de (vhrz2211.HRZ.Uni-Marburg.DE [172.25.3.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by vhrz1865.HRZ.Uni-Marburg.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VkqlX5W28zygB for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 14:06:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from root by vhrz2211.hrz.uni-marburg.de with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s9kjY-000CoY-2G for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com; Wed, 22 May 2024 14:06:16 +0200 From: Daniel Krambrock To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Subject: Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 14:05:49 +0200 Message-Id: <20240522120553.49114-1-krambrock@hrz.uni-marburg.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4VkqlX6VddzygQ X-Rspamd-Score: 1.99 / 12.00 / 15.00 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.125 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy KAM_BLANKSUBJECT 0.25 Message has a blank Subject SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [uni-marburg.de] This series of patches let the user choose a VMID suggestion strategy to avoid the recycled VMID problem. Default is 'next-free', the previous strategy where the suggested VMID is the lowest not used ID in range. This reuses VMIDs. Added options are: - 'max-1': selects the highest existing VMID and adds 1 - 'list': returns the lowest free VMID within the specified range that is not on a list of previously used VMIDs On guest deletion the VMID is added to '/etc/pve/used_vmids.list' --===============3790141731082634035== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============3790141731082634035==--