From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 743571FF18C for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 18:03:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2460E31CC9; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 18:02:56 +0100 (CET) References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 21:01:21 +0400 To: Stefan Hanreich MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Post: From: Matthieu Pignolet via pve-devel Precedence: list Cc: Matthieu Pignolet , Proxmox VE development discussion X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] dns: powerdns: correctly handle different records types (A / AAAA) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1972941385106214125==" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages. --===============1972941385106214125== Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8323AC9CFA for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 18:02:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5C66B31C08 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 18:02:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from tbjjbihbhddc.turbo-smtp.net (tbjjbihbhddc.turbo-smtp.net [199.187.173.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 18:02:21 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mpgn.dev; s=turbo-smtp; x=1743440542; h=Received:Received:Received: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type:Feedback-Id; bh=WMP4lE0cKHKLKHIhKVRqNUs/ghkdO ArhtuXQr5OwyWE=; b=aDUxpltN7WcnOec3pEwLdnGjwjYpUUKugYgu/J+iMrKbE xS1CHpgT6Xli++zFiIefSryB+3BbcJvZtmZZCS/mMUZycK/GgkbnNDIT3Td5D+JM T9KczcR2XxLcpQrpnnT9lYd6YI2iHEea0eCto0W6/xaxi4niiQj3rXNfjAoXOY= Received: (qmail 4055711 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2025 17:02:13 -0000 Received: from ?UNAVAILABLE? by turbo-smtp.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2025 17:02:13 -0000 Received: by mail-pl1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2239c066347so105429475ad.2 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:02:13 -0700 (PDT) X-TurboSMTP-Tracking: 64-0162ab32-00001bf87b170e816000-000-49b1698e X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzHraPhLPNR0QFsEKw2Vgv9z86AphOr/axqxbt+gel8FBwTCYeo iB5ro/aLdrRxGiN7aV9J4BdivVej+maheR+Uk1pvLBNSwnnaZA8bufycOcD6tVIQJ5Lk0gfRxuB pG8n1q6gMd9ysBgse4JiwZ8W+wKQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHz6YkcxDJlhY+IsCsdcU22b/+AhNXSfdFxlre1k/qSWgBGeYSP4+2RGYlMQJA/MNuu1Yk5ZvABifi3HaSN7Ic= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9042:b0:220:fe51:1aab with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22780e3fcdcmr199879815ad.38.1742835731509; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:02:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Matthieu Pignolet Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 21:01:21 +0400 X-Gmail-Original-Message-Id: X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JqEYy60ZqeSZIjG-203n81Uey7Zh6ag5t-1tcoNQPf7jKRpLJjXfeqOeTA Message-ID: Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] dns: powerdns: correctly handle different records types (A / AAAA) To: Stefan Hanreich Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion Feedback-Id: 23243570 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Thank you for giving my patch a spin. The CLA was already signed under my name. --- Matthieu Pignolet On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 8:14=E2=80=AFPM Stefan Hanreich wrote: > Thanks for contributing to Proxmox VE! Have you already signed a CLA [1] > with us? Otherwise we cannot accept your contribution > > Gave this patch a quick spin on my shiny new dual-stack Simple Zone with > DHCP enabled. Could reproduce the issue and the patch fixed it, so > consider this: > > Tested-by: Stefan Hanreich > > [1] https://proxmox.com/en/about/open-source/developers > > On 2/27/25 10:02, Matthieu Pignolet via pve-devel wrote: > > _______________________________________________ > > pve-devel mailing list > > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > > > > --===============1972941385106214125== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel --===============1972941385106214125==--