From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16E2C1FF15C
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed,  8 Jan 2025 13:15:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0B1AE18C02;
	Wed,  8 Jan 2025 13:15:43 +0100 (CET)
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Wed,  8 Jan 2025 13:15:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <mailman.127.1736338542.441.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
From: Lou Lecrivain via pve-devel <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Precedence: list
Cc: Lou Lecrivain <lou.lecrivain@wdz.de>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
Subject: [pve-devel] SPAM: [PATCH pve-network v2 0/7] add support for
 Nautobot IPAM
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5877832378346730414=="
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

--===============5877832378346730414==
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <lou.lecrivain@orange.fr>
X-Original-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Delivered-To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E7FCCB0B0
	for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  8 Jan 2025 13:15:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 883C518BC5
	for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  8 Jan 2025 13:15:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp-14.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.14])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
	for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  8 Jan 2025 13:15:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([176.139.8.107])
	by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA
	id VUyBt1w3ehNNSVUyEtrevn; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 13:15:34 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.fr;
	s=t20230301; t=1736338534;
	bh=Himzex4IJoN+ZfxBzNsXLKKW0fOzAog4h6UApJyjcIQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version;
	b=AQRv1QU8a973CjVQ5iTh03jc35PkgsNhNsdMEZTdCBZNr1PaPb3P3fiRNgXQac12q
	 qJdQc+YgbOp2taoGlo6Mw9Mi16JC5rkxZdRUFvrCj7mdWYPxwF6LRZjHp6RCy6ZNJB
	 oz9Vk06+QrpuHNzYpNjev1lTjspmi3Y6cHVhsejp2OgpAqNmf4ZDzf+p3j5H+sgoPg
	 cVdA+gAm2q2ZTPN/ep8uAEEM3Xldnd5c8APvGaCwtUDNp5/lXh4Fwv8JZTzIZwwVUi
	 lvOSVwPeii59q1ClwkZvFb3OkMuWBOeNdo5vFonHn8kMxJqTONiTG+Nh7+oR5TcGTJ
	 MiglOt5oXbfNA==
X-ME-Helo: localhost
X-ME-Auth: bG91LmxlY3JpdmFpbkBvcmFuZ2UuZnI=
X-ME-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 13:15:34 +0100
X-ME-IP: 176.139.8.107
From: Lou Lecrivain <lou.lecrivain@wdz.de>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
subject: SPAM: [PATCH pve-network v2 0/7] add support for Nautobot IPAM
Date: Wed,  8 Jan 2025 13:15:22 +0100
Message-Id: <20250108121529.5813-1-lou.lecrivain@wdz.de>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  4
	AWL                    -0.067 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
	DKIM_VALID               -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	DKIM_VALID_EF            -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain
	DMARC_REJECT              0.1 DMARC reject policy
	FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN  0.001 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
	FREEMAIL_FROM           0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS   0.24 From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different
	KAM_DMARC_REJECT            6 DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has a DMARC reject policy
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked.  See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information.
	SPF_HELO_PASS          -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
	URIBL_BLOCKED           0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.  See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [nautobotplugin.pm,orange.fr,ipams.pm]

Re,

Sorry for the previous thread, I got another patch mixed up and I didn't
realized. This one is the correct one. 

BR

Lou Lecrivain (7):
  ipam: nautobot support initial commit
  ipam: nautobot: implement plain prefix allocation
  ipam: nautobot: add testing for nautobot plugin
  ipam: nautobot: base plugin + enhance errors
  ipam: nautobot: add checks for prefix deletion
  ipam: nautobot: add documentation
  ipam: nautobot: systematically use namespace

 src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN/Ipams.pm             |   1 +
 src/PVE/Network/SDN/Ipams.pm                  |   3 +
 src/PVE/Network/SDN/Ipams/Makefile            |   2 +-
 src/PVE/Network/SDN/Ipams/NautobotPlugin.pm   | 432 ++++++++++++++++++
 src/test/ipams/nautobot/expected.add_ip       |  11 +
 .../ipams/nautobot/expected.add_ip_notgateway |  11 +
 .../ipams/nautobot/expected.add_next_freeip   |  11 +
 src/test/ipams/nautobot/expected.add_subnet   |  11 +
 src/test/ipams/nautobot/expected.del_ip       |  11 +
 src/test/ipams/nautobot/expected.update_ip    |  11 +
 src/test/ipams/nautobot/ipam_config           |  24 +
 src/test/ipams/nautobot/sdn_config            |  20 +
 src/test/ipams/netbox/ipam_config             |   8 +-
 src/test/ipams/phpipam/ipam_config            |   8 +-
 14 files changed, 561 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 src/PVE/Network/SDN/Ipams/NautobotPlugin.pm
 create mode 100644 src/test/ipams/nautobot/expected.add_ip
 create mode 100644 src/test/ipams/nautobot/expected.add_ip_notgateway
 create mode 100644 src/test/ipams/nautobot/expected.add_next_freeip
 create mode 100644 src/test/ipams/nautobot/expected.add_subnet
 create mode 100644 src/test/ipams/nautobot/expected.del_ip
 create mode 100644 src/test/ipams/nautobot/expected.update_ip
 create mode 100644 src/test/ipams/nautobot/ipam_config
 create mode 100644 src/test/ipams/nautobot/sdn_config

-- 
2.39.5



--===============5877832378346730414==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

--===============5877832378346730414==--