From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B75D1FF164
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:19:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 51B9A13783;
Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:19:24 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:19:20 +0100
From: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <klrrjqmek36vbad6zig2mq4ev5fykzpcft7pbvsly3m42sd6gn@v7igijseao2t>
Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20250214133951.344500-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
<20250214133951.344500-4-g.goller@proxmox.com>
<e289a4aa-5948-466a-8d49-1e6ea9280843@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e289a4aa-5948-466a-8d49-1e6ea9280843@proxmox.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20241002-35-39f9a6
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.029 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs 03/11] add intermediate fabric
representation
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
On 28.02.2025 14:57, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>Am 14.02.25 um 14:39 schrieb Gabriel Goller:
>> This adds the intermediate, type-checked fabrics config. This one is
>> parsed from the SectionConfig and can be converted into the
>> Frr-Representation.
>
>The short description of the patch is good, but I would like to see more
>rationale here about choosing this way, like benefits and trade-offs to other
>options that got evaluated, if this can/will be generic for all fabrics planned,
>..., and definitively some more rust-documentation for public types and modules.
Yep, wrote together a small reasoning and will write some more
documentation for public types.
>One thing I noticed below, I did not managed to do a thorough review besides
>of that yet though.
>> [snip]
>> +impl Hostname {
>> + pub fn new(name: impl Into<String>) -> Hostname {
>> + Self(name.into())
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +// parses a bool from a string OR bool
>> +pub mod serde_option_bool {
>
>might be maybe something to put in proxmox-serde?
Yep, I agree.
Thanks for the review!
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel