From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 582251FF16F for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:51:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 59236F5B0; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:51:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:51:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Anton Iacobaeus References: <20250916075406.33084-2-anton.iacobaeus@canarybit.eu> <20250916075406.33084-7-anton.iacobaeus@canarybit.eu> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20250916075406.33084-7-anton.iacobaeus@canarybit.eu> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1758016270002 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.028 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH edk2-firmware 4/4] Adapt APIC frequency for TD guest X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: Philipp Giersfeld Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 16.09.25 um 11:14 schrieb Anton Iacobaeus: > From: Philipp Giersfeld > > The TDX module advertises the APIC frequency with 25Mhz for TD guest in > contrast to the default frequency of 1Ghz. Hardcode frequency to 25Mhz Ok, but why? It would be great to get an actual rationale encoded here in the commit message. Does this result in any measurable effect on the VM behavior? > for demonstration purposes. This should be changed to either check the > frequency with CPUID 0x15 or by simply setting it to the two known > values depending on whether VM is started as a TD. > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Giersfeld > Signed-off-by: Anton Iacobaeus > --- > ...to-match-the-one-advertised-by-TDX-m.patch | 27 +++++++++++++++++++ > debian/patches/series | 1 + > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 debian/patches/Adapt-Frequency-to-match-the-one-advertised-by-TDX-m.patch > _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel