From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC4C31FF17C for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 17:57:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D27E81825F; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 17:58:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 17:57:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Stefan Hanreich References: <20250723142106.235104-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> <175328294843.3720382.10504362558256531970.b4-ty@proxmox.com> <0ea3edeb-a110-455e-812e-7b9f019d6c77@proxmox.com> <8fc4304b-f718-4881-ad0a-3b9495badeb9@proxmox.com> <2388a286-8086-41f4-97fb-1b796714b9d0@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <2388a286-8086-41f4-97fb-1b796714b9d0@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1753286263482 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH pve-common 1/1] inotify/interfaces: use 'ip link' instead of /proc/net/dev X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 23.07.25 um 17:53 schrieb Stefan Hanreich: > see above, fully supporting the current ifupdown2 capabilities will > require untangling. Ack, thanks for looking into this. Might be best done with switching more of this to rust, ideally with some more tests added upfront and using the same test as closely as possible for old and new. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel