From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1026EF11 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:08:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9ADBE1FA6F for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:08:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:08:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5B3074265E for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:08:50 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:08:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Content-Language: en-US To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Stefan Hrdlicka References: <20221125144008.2988072-1-s.hrdlicka@proxmox.com> <20221125144008.2988072-7-s.hrdlicka@proxmox.com> From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <20221125144008.2988072-7-s.hrdlicka@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.027 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [qemuserver.pm] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH V4 qemu-server 6/7] adapt behavior for detaching drives to deatching container mount points X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:08:51 -0000 The info from this commit title is good to have as part of the commit message, but it would be nicer if the title would describe the change rather than just referencing another repository. Am 25.11.22 um 15:40 schrieb Stefan Hrdlicka: > if a storage is not available a volume will be added to the container s/container/VM/ > config as unused. before it would just disappear from the config > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hrdlicka > --- > PVE/QemuServer.pm | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm > index 331677f..b57226b 100644 > --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm > +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm > @@ -2038,7 +2038,11 @@ sub vmconfig_register_unused_drive { > delete $conf->{cloudinit}; > } elsif (!drive_is_cdrom($drive)) { > my $volid = $drive->{file}; > - if (vm_is_volid_owner($storecfg, $vmid, $volid)) { > + my ($storeid, $volname) = PVE::Storage::parse_volume_id($volid); > + if (!PVE::Storage::storage_config($storecfg, $storeid, 1)) { > + # if storage is not in config, skip owner check and add as unused > + PVE::QemuConfig->add_unused_volume($conf, $volid, $vmid); > + } elsif (vm_is_volid_owner($storecfg, $vmid, $volid)) { > PVE::QemuConfig->add_unused_volume($conf, $volid, $vmid); > } > }