From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C5A7AFF0
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:39:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 637471772
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:38:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E51351738
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:38:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B675842F49
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:38:40 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <fc1b9233-a5d0-d987-df43-e4450b22816c@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:38:39 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:100.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/100.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20220113110405.67232-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220113110405.67232-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.023 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH-SERIES v2
 guest-common/qemu-server/container] activate storages for snapshot
 operations
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:39:11 -0000

On 13.01.22 12:03, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> to make it work when the storage is just not active yet, and have
> early errors when the storage cannot be activated. Also prohibits
> snapshot operations when an involved storage is disabled, but
> otherwise available.
> 
> 
> Both qemu-server and pve-container build-depend upon pve-guest-common
> for the added tests.
> 
> 
> Changes from v1:
>     * Rebase on current master.
> 
> 
> guest-common:
> 
> Fabian Ebner (2):
>   config: remove unused variable
>   config: activate affected storages for snapshot operations

> 
> qemu-server:
> 
> Fabian Ebner (1):
>   snapshot: implement __snapshot_activate_storages
> 

> 
> container:
> 
> Fabian Ebner (3):
>   config: snapshot_delete_remove_drive: check for parsed value
>   config: parse_volume: don't die when noerr is set
>   snapshot: implement __snapshot_activate_storages
> 

applied rest of series a while ago but seems I forgot to reply here, thanks!