From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2CBE9648
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:35:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BCB17314C4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:34:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:34:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DD21244BF4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:34:57 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <fbda7d0d-275e-e2f9-f548-622b7b0a9987@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:34:57 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:107.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/107.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stefan Hrdlicka <s.hrdlicka@proxmox.com>
References: <20221110132450.567121-1-s.hrdlicka@proxmox.com>
 <20221110132450.567121-3-s.hrdlicka@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221110132450.567121-3-s.hrdlicka@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: =?UTF-8?Q?0=0A=09?=AWL -0.031 Adjusted
 score from AWL reputation of From: =?UTF-8?Q?address=0A=09?=BAYES_00 -1.9
 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 =?UTF-8?Q?Alignment=0A=09?=SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an
 SPF =?UTF-8?Q?Record=0A=09?=SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH V4 manager 2/3] fix #3967: enable ZFS
 dRAID creation in WebGUI
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:35:28 -0000

Am 10/11/2022 um 14:24 schrieb Stefan Hrdlicka:
> add fields for additional settings required by ZFS dRAID
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hrdlicka <s.hrdlicka@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  www/manager6/node/ZFS.js | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
> 
>

applied, thanks! Note that I reworked both the layout and the config handling a bit.

Basically we can avoid quite some view-model binding/formula stuff and the extra
field just by using the onGetValues submit hook that our InputPanel provides.

Moving the fields then below just makes the form a bit more balanced, no biggie
there.