From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0719160A40 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:10:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 051731BF5C for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:10:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 5D20A1BF4F for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:10:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2CB474474D; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:10:12 +0100 (CET) To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Graeme Seaton References: <019e33dd-6722-f2b2-24a3-f41d59f1527b@graemes.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:10:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:84.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/84.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <019e33dd-6722-f2b2-24a3-f41d59f1527b@graemes.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.325 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] OpenZFS 2.0 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:10:13 -0000 Hi, On 02.12.20 13:45, Graeme Seaton wrote: > Notice that OpenZFS 2.0 has been officially released at: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases/tag/zfs-2.0.0 yes, we noticed that too :) > Is integration into PVE on the roadmap? (I'm a sucker for new toys ;-) ) > Copying over my answer from a related forum thread[0]: Yes, we plan to include it in Proxmox VE 6.4, which is due in the first half of 2021, if I had to extrapolate from past releases. At least if no general issues comes up and the upgrade path is straight forward. But even though it's a big increase of version number, it's a rather sensible sized release code-wise, so it should not pose bigger problems (knocks wood). It'll trickle into the package repositories a bit earlier after passing through testing here (2021/Q1), we'll post an update in the forum once available. cheers, Thomas [0]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/openzfs-2-0.79948/#post-353631