From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFDAE93C6 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:26:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BDD8EF7A8 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:26:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0D910F79D for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:26:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D630C42B0F for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:26:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:26:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:100.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/100.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Stoiko Ivanov References: <20220425163301.3740833-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20220425163301.3740833-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.030 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH pve-kernel-meta] proxmox-boot: fix #3729 add --graceful to bootctl invocation X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 06:26:08 -0000 On 25.04.22 18:33, Stoiko Ivanov wrote: > The version of systemd boot in bullseye, tries writing an efivar which > is not writeable on certain (broken) UEFIs (HP thin clients). > > The issue was not present in the version in buster (the variable > simply did not get written) and can be worked around by adding > --graceful to the `bootctl install` command. > > see also: > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/13603 > > Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov > --- > originally sent as part of a series: > https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2022-March/052054.html > as: > https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2022-March/052052.html > > however since the issue is really unrelated to the series, and causes > (more) issues for systems with (certain) broken UEFI systems I'm resending > it isolated of the series (which IIRC is a bit too large to integrate > currently) Yeah please send unrelated fixes outside of feature series, way easier to not overlook them and get them in the repo earlier, as now I need to do an additional bump just to get this packaged... And if they're semi-related or, whyever else, send in the series please put them always up front as first patches to allow picking them up already easily while the later stuff may get another revision. > > bin/proxmox-boot-tool | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > applied, thanks!