From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D03588758
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:48:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AD33D1B525
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:48:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:48:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 030D143E9C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:48:36 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <f7ce9975-188f-12ff-4a16-d48a1ed21e02@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:48:35 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:107.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/107.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
References: <20221115130248.1007325-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20221115130248.1007325-5-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <1668524410.yomu90q6hb.astroid@yuna.none>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <1668524410.yomu90q6hb.astroid@yuna.none>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: =?UTF-8?Q?0=0A=09?=AWL -0.031 Adjusted
 score from AWL reputation of From: =?UTF-8?Q?address=0A=09?=BAYES_00 -1.9
 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 =?UTF-8?Q?Alignment=0A=09?=NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF
 =?UTF-8?Q?Record=0A=09?=SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH cluster v10 4/5] datacenter.cfg: add tag
 rights control to the datacenter config
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 07:48:36 -0000

Am 15/11/2022 um 16:17 schrieb Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler:
> this one is worded differently than the rest (maybe):
>=20
> 'none' no tags are modifiable.
> 'list' tags from 'user-allow-list' are modifiable.
> 'existing' like list, but already existing tags of resource are also mo=
difiable.
> 'free' no tag restrictions.

also switch "modifiable" to "useable" (or settable, if that's a word)? As=

modifying here implies the tags as object themselves, which could be conf=
using
if we really mean that those are the ones a user can set or remove to a v=
irtual
guest.