From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B90411FF187 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 12:00:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B33AE49D2; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 12:01:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 12:00:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Fiona Ebner To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Laurent GUERBY References: <20251014143946.160679-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <20251014143946.160679-15-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <5eeef6c68d22ab2a6882ba3ee1bb852b1ae31108.camel@guerby.net> <0e68a2ef-e09a-4da8-8e01-b72c62ebc3bd@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <0e68a2ef-e09a-4da8-8e01-b72c62ebc3bd@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1760954438054 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 14/16] introduce QSD module for qemu-storage-daemon functionality X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 20.10.25 um 11:50 AM schrieb Fiona Ebner: > Am 20.10.25 um 10:57 AM schrieb Laurent GUERBY: >> If possible using qemu-storage-daemon to export the rbd image to swtpm >> would still allow proxmox to leave the TPM disk on ceph while >> benefiting from recent ceph features. > > It's would be possible, but it rather sounds like the real issue is that > the kernel module is outdated. And for container volumes, krbd is also > always used, so it would need to be adapted there too. Otherwise, you > will still break container volumes when bumping the minimum required > client version. Also, the performance impact would likely be bad for containers (but one would need to actually test this). _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel