From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C71C9EA54 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 11:05:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 749403EB50 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 11:04:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 11:04:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4EC0841DDF for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 11:04:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 11:04:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20230605074350.98641-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <5ef14027-21ba-53d6-1520-5b11cb5e3434@proxmox.com> From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <5ef14027-21ba-53d6-1520-5b11cb5e3434@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.094 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH edk2-firmware] add patch to work around older guest kernel bug X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 09:05:06 -0000 Am 06.06.23 um 16:26 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: > > nit: a slightly more telling subject could have been something like: > > backport limiting the phys-bits to 46 for bug in old guest kernel Yes, sorry. My commit title was too generic. > Am 05/06/2023 um 09:43 schrieb Fiona Ebner: >> by limiting the phys-bits to 46 instead of 47. On Ubuntu 18.04 with >> kernel 4.15, using 47 leads to a strange issue where initialization of >> VirtIO devices would fail. >> >> Reported in the community forum: >> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/127410/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner >> --- >> ...latformInitLib-limit-phys-bits-to-46.patch | 46 +++++++++++++++++++ >> debian/patches/series | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 debian/patches/0001-OvmfPkg-PlatformInitLib-limit-phys-bits-to-46.patch >> >> > > applied, but fixed line endings of patch, edk2 (sadly) uses Windows-Style \r\n, > but the patch only got \n, so failed building a DSC: > Hmm, it's correct in my repository and in the formatted patch, but not here in the mail anymore. Do I need to specify something special with git send-email?