From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A71648AA5E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:03:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A4EB31912A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:03:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:03:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B4EB1433FC
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:03:32 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <f361a768-c91a-0795-d3a8-6b4d1a9a16b0@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:03:31 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <a5789fb9-b22a-a58a-9190-fa34e89c41a2@bluematt.me>
 <63fbf096-d456-6538-d6b2-c6c6ff5c69fe@proxmox.com>
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <63fbf096-d456-6538-d6b2-c6c6ff5c69fe@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.046 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com, lxc.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] Update cpu.weight default to match
 documented default
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 10:03:33 -0000

Sorry, replied to the wrong mail. Please ignore this.

On 19.08.22 12:01, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 16.08.22 05:49, Matt Corallo wrote:
>> Proxmox documentation describes the default CPU weight as 1024 in
>> numerous places. However, when unset, the Linux default CGROUP
>> weight is 100.
>>
> 
> I'm not saying increasing the timeout can't be worth it, but I haven't
> seen many reports about the default being too low. There is a patch in
> the works [0] allowing to set custom options in the storage
> configuration for CIFS which would allow changing the timeout only for
> setups that actually require it.
> 
> [0]: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2022-July/053645.html
> 
> P.S. re-sending while including the pve-devel list
> 
>> This simply always writes an `lxc.cgroup2.cpu.weight` option to the
>> LXC config file, defaulting to 1024 instead of omitting the option
>> entirely.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matt Corallo <git@bluematt.me>
>> ---
>>  src/PVE/LXC.pm | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/PVE/LXC.pm b/src/PVE/LXC.pm
>> index fe63087..ca453a9 100644
>> --- a/src/PVE/LXC.pm
>> +++ b/src/PVE/LXC.pm
>> @@ -712,6 +712,9 @@ sub update_lxc_config {
>>          die "cpu weight (shares) must be in range [1, 10000]\n"
>>          if $shares < 1 || $shares > 10000;
>>          $raw .= "lxc.cgroup2.cpu.weight = $shares\n";
>> +    } else {
>> +        # Default as documented
>> +        $raw .= "lxc.cgroup2.cpu.weight = 1024\n";
>>      }
>>      }
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel