From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D71F29816E for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:24:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 960D31A29A for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:24:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:24:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CBB1F40B19 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:24:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:24:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 From: Friedrich Weber To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Markus Frank Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20230419064348.11953-1-m.frank@proxmox.com> <20230419064348.11953-5-m.frank@proxmox.com> <2ab8625a-4b7a-40d9-eaed-4b7800141d81@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <2ab8625a-4b7a-40d9-eaed-4b7800141d81@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.469 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.669 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v6 4/5] added clipboard checkbox to VM Options X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 10:24:47 -0000 On 20/04/2023 18:12, Friedrich Weber wrote: > Glitch #2: > 1) Debian VM with XFCE and spice-vdagent 0.20.0, also install xclip > 2) Type "x" in noVNC clipboard window > 3) Inside the VM, run: > ``` > $ xclip -o -selection clipboard | xxd > 00000000: 7800 x. > ``` > Note the additional null byte after the x -- this probably shouldn't be > there. I'm not sure what the cause is, maybe it's something on my system > (I'm using Firefox), or spice-vdagent? Just for the record: Markus looked into it and as it turns out, the null byte also appears when using QEMU's -vnc argument and directly connecting with TigerVNC. So this glitch seems unrelated to noVNC/our noVNC integration and there's nothing to address in this patch series.