From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC8168FFA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  1 Mar 2021 14:00:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8F8FB20160
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  1 Mar 2021 14:00:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id EE24F2013A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  1 Mar 2021 14:00:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ACA15436E7
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  1 Mar 2021 14:00:03 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <f0ddeace-c7fb-1452-2f1c-75a5aa97ebef@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 14:00:02 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:87.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/87.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20210301120223.14688-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210301120223.14688-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.059 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 T_SPF_TEMPERROR          0.01 SPF: test of record failed (temperror)
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 qemu-server] fix #3324: clone disk:
 use larger blocksize for EFI disk
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 13:00:08 -0000

On 01.03.21 13:02, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> Moving to Ceph is very slow when bs=1. Instead, use a larger block size in
> combination with the (currently) PVE-specific osize option to specify the
> desired output size.
> 
> Suggested-by: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Thanks to Dietmar for pointing me in the right direction.
> 
> We actually have the exact feature I wished for (see patch #11 in pve-qemu).
> I missed it the first time around, because it is not described in the man page,
> only the keyword is stated in the short synopsis.
> 
> Changes from v1:
>     * use osize option to control the output file size
> 
>  PVE/QemuServer.pm | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!