From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42DA57C1A4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:30:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 328AF1D37B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:30:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:30:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8B42D4261D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:30:09 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <f0bb6fe5-57b5-5e2d-3015-9a5c1fa4a4bf@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:30:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>, Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
References: <20220713104758.651614-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
 <20220713104758.651614-3-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
 <a60cbbbd-51a4-cd5a-85ea-94ed50757d14@proxmox.com>
 <58a45815-0801-528b-dacb-aaaa920df722@proxmox.com>
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <58a45815-0801-528b-dacb-aaaa920df722@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.098 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 2/3] disks: die if storage name is
 already in use
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 12:30:40 -0000



On 7/14/22 14:12, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> Am 14.07.22 um 13:13 schrieb Dominik Csapak:> On 7/13/22 12:47, Aaron
> Lauterer wrote:
>>> +    my $poollist = { map { $_->{name} => 1 } @{$pools} };
>>
>> does that really make sense here? would it not be easier to just
>> iterate? e.g.
>>
>> ----
>> for my $pool (@$pools) {
>>      die "..." if $pool->{name} eq $name;
>> }
>> ----
>>
>> (i admit, it's 1 line longer, but a bit more readable?)
>>
>>> +    die "pool '${name}' already exists on node '$node'\n" if
> 
> Or just use grep ;)
> 

even better :) (i always forget about perls grep)