From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0598F74276 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 09:29:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E3D76A9C2 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 09:29:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 33615A9A8 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 09:29:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EB7854213A for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 09:29:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 09:29:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/88.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Victor Hooi Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion , PVE development discussion References: <1c3b90d3-e6c3-accb-97fe-5e0603579c5f@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.041 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_SHORT 0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Ceph Pacific testing? X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 07:29:38 -0000 Hi, On 18.04.21 00:48, Victor Hooi wrote: > Awesome! Really excited by this! > > Do we have any indication of when this year the PVE 7.0 testing will begin? No, nothing definitive yet, if I had to guess, I'd say that the test repo would get available in Q2 rather than Q3, though. > Also - will it still be based on a Ubuntu kernel? Or any chance we can get > a newer kernel from Debian? =) Debian 11 Bullseye will ship the 5.10 kernel, Ubuntu 21.04 will ship the 5.11 kernel. We will use the newer one from Ubuntu, and actually, that one is already available for testing in Proxmox VE 6 since almost a month[0]. Note, while we did not see any issue anywhere, we still recommend to stay on 5.4, which will stay the default kernel for the remaining PVE 6.x lifetime. With above note in mind, you can install it by executing: apt update apt install pve-kernel-5.11 cheers, Thomas [0]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/kernel-5-11.86225/ > > Thanks, > Victor > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 8:44 PM Thomas Lamprecht > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 14.04.21 22:05, Victor Hooi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Ceph Pacific was recently announced: >>> >>> https://ceph.io/releases/v16-2-0-pacific-released/ >>> >>> Do you know if anybody has started testing this for Proxmox yet? >>> >>> Or are there alpha/beta packages we could run in a test lab? >> >> FYI: We plan to build and release this for upcoming PVE 7.0 this year, >> based on >> Debian bullseye. >> >> cheers, >> Thomas >> >> >