From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 685731FF170 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:00:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1B1FF1D840; Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:01:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:00:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20241111135436.82773-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <1ba68b4a-58ab-4376-b80f-0f877d856c9d@proxmox.com> <5126c251-64fd-44fe-b1a6-fda9074eb9a1@proxmox.com> <3cdae092-24a3-4ba0-bb69-54cbb8b2efd3@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <3cdae092-24a3-4ba0-bb69-54cbb8b2efd3@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.054 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] partially-applied: [PATCH-SERIES v4 docs/qemu-server] more robust handling of fleecing images X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 18.11.24 um 21:31 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: > Am 18.11.24 um 09:52 schrieb Fiona Ebner: >> Regarding the patch "schema: add fleecing-images config property", >> Fabian off-list suggested using a config section "special:fleecing" >> instead of a property, so that it is truly internal-only. If we go for >> that, the commit should be reverted. Which approach do you prefer? > > FYI: I reverted that commit for now, this can always be implemented, > no need to rush it now if there are better ideas to represent it are > already floating around. Thank you! Yes, sorry, I didn't get around to flesh out the "special section" approach yesterday. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel