From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C92FC1FF173 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:47:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AE15A122EB; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:47:52 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:47:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Fiona Ebner , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20250129155339.164696-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Filip Schauer In-Reply-To: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH cluster/guest-common/manager/qemu-server v2 0/9] fix #5657: allow configuring RNG device as non-root user X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Superseded by: https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20250210153734.103381-1-f.schauer@proxmox.com/ On 30/01/2025 13:17, Fiona Ebner wrote: > It's a lot of overhead for a very specific kind of device. What irks me > is that we have a lot of boilerplate duplication for each new mapping > type, also for the API endpoints. Nothing specific to your series of > course, but maybe something we could/should address? Agree On 30/01/2025 13:17, Fiona Ebner wrote: > In the UI, it > probably would also be better to have a separate view for each mapping > type? I split resource mapping types into tabbed views in v3. On 30/01/2025 13:17, Fiona Ebner wrote: > When I try to add a mapping in the UI, I get > Parameter verification failed. (400) > map: type check ('array') failed Fixed in v3 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel