From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A657F808D5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:57:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9C82E19E63
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:57:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 5CD0D19E56
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:57:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 26CE543D54;
 Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:57:20 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <ec31ff3c-90b1-3ebe-c05c-2ef032c8fd7d@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:57:19 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:95.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/95.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Jens_Mei=c3=9fner?= <meissner@b1-systems.de>
References: <20211118084934.4493-1-meissner@b1-systems.de>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211118084934.4493-1-meissner@b1-systems.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.110 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2] Add DNS challenge schema for knot.
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 10:57:21 -0000

On 18.11.21 09:49, Jens Mei=C3=9Fner wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jens Mei=C3=9Fner <meissner@b1-systems.de>
> ---
>  src/dns-challenge-schema.json | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>=20
>

applied, thanks!

Maybe one could open a issue on acme.sh asking regarding the discrepancy
between the documented KNOT_ parameters and the ones actually used in
the code..