From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C75321FF179 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 14:47:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D72863FED; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 14:48:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 14:48:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Anton Iacobaeus References: <20251028125459.287308-1-anton.iacobaeus@canarybit.eu> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1762955276330 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.018 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH edk2-firmware/manager/qemu-server v3 0/9] Add support for Intel TDX X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Hi Anton, sorry for the delay! Am 10.11.25 um 4:03 PM schrieb Anton Iacobaeus: > Hi, > > I understand review time can vary but just wanted to check on the status > of this series. Seems like it got formatted incorrectly in the archives, > but it looks fine in my mail client. If a resend or other clarifications > is needed before review I am happy to do so. Yes, apparently something in our mail stack (upgrade is planned with the hope it makes things better) mixes up line-endings somewhere even if sent with '--transfer-encoding=base64' but that is fine, I can fix it up when applying. I also needed to rebase the patches on top of the latest changes [0]. I did not go ahead with applying the edk2 patches yet, because I got a question: Don't we want to enroll the Microsoft and distro keys for the image? Debian upstream added TDX support just a few days ago and they enroll the Microsoft and distro keys and even dropped the variant without pre-enrolled keys [1] that was part of the initial merge. The changes [0] include an "enroll_vendor" helper so we could use that and get an OVMF_TDX_4M.ms.fd image. What do you think? Best Regards, Fiona [0]: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-edk2-firmware.git;a=commitdiff;h=c50fc74a992c0913a0fb84dc33c8ce8c36230604;hp=714c8a05662580d4553e045b3c404b614dc1ac27 [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/qemu-team/edk2/-/commit/4dd2f2c8de1e3c6c3391cd9c25377966f556f2ff _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel