From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D08977275F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:08:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C54FE26FE4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:08:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B9A0E26FD5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:08:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 781DA41D87
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:08:39 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <e9b84d05-091e-62b5-b36f-c7615dcd86d0@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:08:38 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/88.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
References: <20210215152647.7328-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
 <20210215152647.7328-2-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210215152647.7328-2-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.043 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v5 widget-toolkit 1/3] window/edit: add
 option to disable reset button
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 07:08:40 -0000

On 15.02.21 16:26, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> Sometimes the reset button does not make sense and the isCreate option
> does not fit as well because with it, the submit button will be enabled
> right away instead of waiting for the form to be valid.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> v1 -> v2 -> v3 -> v4 -> v5: nothing changed
> 
> This helps to reuse the PVE.window.Edit component in a modern viewModel
> and controller way instead of building it all by hand the old way with a
> large initComponent method.
> 
> A possible candidate for refactoring after this would be the
> qemu/HDMove.js component.
> 
> 
>  src/window/Edit.js | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!