From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8F011FF56B
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:22:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8F04912B96;
	Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:22:50 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <e980c406-dd07-4daf-a245-945705a53129@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:22:46 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>, Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>
References: <20240415085002.665246-1-m.frank@proxmox.com>
 <20240415085002.665246-2-m.frank@proxmox.com>
 <2d790314-0973-4cf1-937e-00041cf8b0bf@proxmox.com>
 <3ff3ecf6-08b5-49fb-8d6f-84448ff32b78@proxmox.com>
 <9b0add74-7f5e-41bd-b47b-91d3d680f9d9@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <9b0add74-7f5e-41bd-b47b-91d3d680f9d9@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.015 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v10 2/2] ui: machine: add link to
 documentation of the system settings
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On 4/22/24 15:21, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 22/04/2024 um 15:18 schrieb Dominik Csapak:
>> On 4/22/24 15:13, Fiona Ebner wrote:
>>> Why not the more accurate 'qm_machine_type' (was introduced in pve-docs = 8.1.0)?
>>
>> you're right, would be even better (did not realize that existed), i/you can send/push a follow up?
>>
> 
> both of you can push to this repo, for this little change I think doing so directly
> without patch is fine

pushed a follow up


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel