From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE46F5AB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:16:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 776E121998
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:15:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:15:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BE571448F1
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:15:49 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <e93d44a1-806f-82d8-0820-e4a5fb19c778@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:15:49 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.5.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Mira Limbeck <m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
References: <20221215165700.2061397-1-m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221215165700.2061397-1-m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.029 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [report.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] report: filter comments in VM/CT
 configs
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 12:16:20 -0000

Am 15.12.22 um 17:57 schrieb Mira Limbeck:
> diff --git a/PVE/Report.pm b/PVE/Report.pm
> index 90b7cb1c..7ebe98f7 100644
> --- a/PVE/Report.pm
> +++ b/PVE/Report.pm
> @@ -5,16 +5,34 @@ use warnings;
>  
>  use PVE::Tools;
>  
> +my sub file2text {
> +    my ($file, $filter) = @_;
> +    my $text = "\n# cat $file\n";
> +
> +    my $contents = PVE::Tools::file_get_contents($file);
> +    if ($filter) {
> +	foreach my $line (split('\n', $contents)) {
> +	    next if $line =~ m/^\s*#/;
> +	    next if $line =~ m/^cipassword/;
> +
Should we rather mask the value instead of dropping the whole line, so
that we can see that /some/ cipassword is set? Might be more relevant
for future filtered options.