From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC1A69293B for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:59:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A48176BF1 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:59:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:59:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AF5F7442F8 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:59:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:59:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20240130171057.438025-1-f.weber@proxmox.com> <20240130171057.438025-4-f.weber@proxmox.com> <6f90c4bd-fe81-4ebc-8412-33b2c7e20609@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Friedrich Weber In-Reply-To: <6f90c4bd-fe81-4ebc-8412-33b2c7e20609@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.070 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container v2 3/6] fix #4474: lxc api: add overrule-shutdown parameter to stop endpoint X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 08:59:58 -0000 On 06/04/2024 17:07, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 30/01/2024 um 18:10 schrieb Friedrich Weber: > [...] >> + raise_param_exc({ 'overrule-shutdown' => "Not applicable for HA resources." }) >> + if $overrule_shutdown; > > This probably could be implemented through a CRM command and would be nice > to have in the long-run. The more HA and non-HA resources can be managed > the same the better, as otherwise it's causing friction to use HA. > > The same holds for the qemu-server patch. > > But, I'm fine with doing this separately later on, as this on its own is > already an improvement for quite a few users. OK, sounds good. Then I'll keep v3 limited to non-HA guests. I'll either keep the original bug #4474 [1] open and comment that overruling is not yet implemented for HA resources, or open a new bug. [1] https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4474