From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD4BA73494 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:47:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BAC3018630 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:47:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [212.186.127.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0844718623 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:47:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C23C243B9A for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:47:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:47:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/88.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Oguz Bektas , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20210414122431.607305-1-o.bektas@proxmox.com> <7a633f6c-6295-16ec-8329-9775b7b36c3f@proxmox.com> <20210415094430.GA25302@gaia.proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20210415094430.GA25302@gaia.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.291 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [linuxcontainers.org] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] SPAM: [PATCH lxcfs] bump version to 4.0.7-pve1 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:47:52 -0000 On 15.04.21 11:44, Oguz Bektas wrote: > hi, > >> please ensure that your git-send-email does not picks up S-b, R-b, etc. git trailers >> of patches by patches and wrongly CC's those people like happened here. > oops sorry about that. > >> Further, separate debian/changelog entries from the actual changes, in general >> rather not send updates to debian/changelog. >> >> It would be also good to have a short summary of changes/fixes/features from that >> new release, i.e., why should be update (what's fixed, or what's changed and thus >> a potential regression?)... > it's a minor release and the main highlight is the improvements in swap behavior > consistency. > > basically the previously cherry-picked patches for some swap > and memory improvements are now merged upstream. > > https://discuss.linuxcontainers.org/t/lxcfs-4-0-7-lts-has-been-released/9893 > So this has basically zero value... I'd like to avoid generating work by just redoing a release with the exact state we have already build and released in December 2020...