From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CFAE806B5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:21:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6C36516D08
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:21:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id DFBD116CF9
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:21:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B0E7843D85
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:21:01 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <e6002ef2-6f89-7f4e-5265-2649324974b1@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:21:01 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:95.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/95.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20211118070538.357481-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211118070538.357481-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.111 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH qemu] fix dependencies on headers for
 'vma' and 'pbs_restore'
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:21:32 -0000

On 18.11.21 08:05, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> both of them depend on generated header files, so we have to specify
> them as sources. Otherwise, it happens (at least on some machines) that
> they will be compiled before the headers are generated, aborting the
> build.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
> thanks @wolfgang for helping me understand meson a bit better ;)
> 
>  .../pve/0025-PVE-Backup-add-vma-backup-format-code.patch      | 2 +-
>  ...PVE-Backup-pbs-restore-new-command-to-restore-from-p.patch | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, but prefixed commit subject with "buildsys", thanks!