From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFF0A76122
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:41:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B616B20AA3
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:41:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A3AD620A94
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:41:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 70F8346271
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:41:13 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <e5bf5309-0642-8664-94ed-39f85880edf2@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:41:12 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/89.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20210419110048.20791-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210419110048.20791-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.014 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH widget-toolkit/pve-manager] move some
 code to widget-toolkit
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:41:44 -0000

On 19.04.21 13:00, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> manager needs a depends on a bumped widget-toolkit ofc
> 
> proxmox-widget-toolkit:
> 
> Dominik Csapak (4):
>   Utils: add several render functions from PVE
>   bring over some icons from PVE
>   Utils: refactor updateColumns from pve-manager
>   panel: add StatusView from PVE
> 
> pve-manger:
> 
> Dominik Csapak (4):
>   ui: Utils: use render functions from widget-toolkit
>   ui: use some icons from widget-toolkit
>   ui: Utils: use updateColumns from widget-toolkit
>   ui: panel/StatusView: use from widget-toolkit instead
> 



applied series, besides one issue in the status panel (replied inline) it was all OK,
FWICT, thanks!

Process wise it would be nicer to include the pbs one here too, or at least the
widget-toolkit in the pbs-series, it's a bit hard to follow the correlation else...