From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D590B6CA6A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:57:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C708E2D214
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:57:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 614662D207
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:57:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 296AB45987
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:57:29 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <e5b19455-8d63-a104-b1dc-994d888cfd5b@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:57:28 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/88.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
References: <20210330155952.16389-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
 <20210330155952.16389-2-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210330155952.16389-2-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.044 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [qemuserver.pm]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 2/2] increase timeout for QMP
 block_resize
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:57:29 -0000

On 30.03.21 17:59, Stefan Reiter wrote:
> In testing this usually completes almost immediately, but in theory this
> is a storage/IO operation and as such can take a bit to finish. It's
> certainly not unthinkable that it might take longer than the default *3
> seconds* we've given it so far. Make it a minute.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Optional for the fix, but seems like a good idea.
> 
>  PVE/QemuServer.pm | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> index 1c0b5c2..f9379f6 100644
> --- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> +++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
> @@ -4291,8 +4291,13 @@ sub qemu_block_resize {
>      my $padding = (1024 - $size % 1024) % 1024;
>      $size = $size + $padding;
>  
> -    mon_cmd($vmid, "block_resize", device => $deviceid, size => int($size));
> -
> +    mon_cmd(
> +	$vmid,
> +	"block_resize",
> +	device => $deviceid,
> +	size => int($size),
> +	timeout => 60,
> +    );
>  }
>  
>  sub qemu_volume_snapshot {
>