From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B9E091FB7 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 11:50:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E92F01644B for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 11:50:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 11:50:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AD481447F8 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 11:50:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 11:50:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20230321164452.268358-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.683 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.528 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-resource-scheduling] pve static: add one to avoid boosting tiny relative differences X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 09:50:47 -0000 Am 22.03.23 um 09:32 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: > Am 21/03/2023 um 17:44 schrieb Fiona Ebner: >> Only the relative difference for values between different alternatives >> is relevant, meaning 0.002 vs 0.004 and 0.2 vs 0.4 will influence the >> scoring in the same way. This is not really desirable, because values >> closer to 1.0 indicate higher load and thus should influence the >> scoring more than differences that are actually tiny, but big when >> viewed as a relative difference. >> >> To avoid the issue, simply add 1.0 to all values. Like that, 1.002 vs >> 1.004 will also be small when viewed as a relative difference. >> >> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner >> --- >> src/pve_static.rs | 10 ++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> > > applied series (yesterday already), thanks! Seems like only this single patch was applied, I don't see proxmox-perl-rs ones there (still apply cleanly).