From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6DAC6750A;
 Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:23:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 987A42400D;
 Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:23:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id F3DEC24000;
 Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:23:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C247A44818;
 Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:23:06 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, aderumier@odiso.com,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20210111111409.32385-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
 <a91ee7b1e8094581fefa180f02b40a47f14eb722.camel@odiso.com>
 <a92a21dc-58a1-7c41-71a0-b840118e323a@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <e3984622-e0c0-50ce-1c93-035df4d77de1@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:23:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:84.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/84.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a92a21dc-58a1-7c41-71a0-b840118e323a@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.068 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [pbs-devel] [PATCH 00/11] live-restore for PBS
 snapshots
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:23:37 -0000

On 12.01.21 11:31, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> On 11.01.21 16:50, aderumier@odiso.com wrote:
>> if we could make some kind of qemu-nbd + mount loop of the backup
>> volume for example.
> 
> That is already possible through qemu-nbd tool (we have a PBS block driver backend),
> see: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/2020-July/171883.html

Oh, I missed checking the pve-devel list where Stefan already pointed you to
the client's map command (at the time I wrote above linked message that did
not yet exist) - so you can ignore that mail.