From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A77723E0
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:40:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 658242E8F7
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:39:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 022B32E8DA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:39:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C796E42FA4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:39:36 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <e07db805-f18a-f781-e1b6-c351cb16dbb2@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:39:31 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/90.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
References: <20210610111516.90018-1-w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210610111516.90018-1-w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.909 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [lxc.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH container] configure cpu/cpuset/memory
 cgroupv2 values
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:40:07 -0000

On 10.06.21 13:15, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
> While the hotplug code utilized PVE::CGroup and already
> supported cgroupv2 with this, we did not write out the
> configuration before.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
> ---
> These values should correspond to how the PVE::CGroup live-apply code
> works.
> 
> After this there's 1 more missing piece for pure-cgroup2 systems:
> handling the devices we currently handle in the autodev hook. This is
> very different in cgv2.
> 
>  src/PVE/LXC.pm            | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  src/lxc-pve-prestart-hook |  3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!