From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51C35735C5 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:54:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 487AC8FA9 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:54:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id AF2428F96 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:54:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7FF7B466B4 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 13:54:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 13:54:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/89.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Stefan Reiter References: <20210527104334.31743-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20210527104334.31743-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.234 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH 0/3] Upgrade to QEMU 6.0 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 11:54:03 -0000 On 27.05.21 12:43, Stefan Reiter wrote: > Mostly smooth migration, so far testing has shown good results. Both my > automated tests and some manual ones have shown little issues. > > Smaller issues encountered so far: > * guest agent (especially fs-thaw) still seems to have some trouble, especially > on Windows, updating the agent and virtio drivers in the VM seemed to help the > situation though > * one time, not reproducible, my mouse stopped working entirely in a Windows VM > - so far I blame it on Microsoft ;) > > The previously sent qemu-server patches are required for 6.0 to work correctly > (probably should have been part of this series, but oh well): > https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2021-May/048327.html > > > pve-qemu: Stefan Reiter (3): > udpate and rebase to QEMU v6.0.0 > debian: ignore submodule checks in QEMU build > update keycodemapdb for 6.0 > > debian/changelog | 6 + We normally try to keep the actual version bump at the package level in a separate commit, and sometimes there's a chance that there are some minor (packaging) adaption to be made, so it can often be left to do for the uploaded. any how, applied series, thanks!