From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 427FC1FF137 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2026 16:09:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 87CB822BEA; Tue, 3 Feb 2026 16:09:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 16:09:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu-server 1/2] tests: improve multiarch build support To: Dominik Csapak , pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260203142209.3614946-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <96b3810e-bb32-4045-bbeb-f5aa4c82d3f4@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <96b3810e-bb32-4045-bbeb-f5aa4c82d3f4@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1770131317147 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.020 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: YVWJUBFDHC3BO5AG2VYSGTO6WH4JLI2Z X-Message-ID-Hash: YVWJUBFDHC3BO5AG2VYSGTO6WH4JLI2Z X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Am 03.02.26 um 16:03 schrieb Dominik Csapak: > > alternatively, we could write out 'PVE::Tools::get_host_arch' everywhere > without importing, then we'd only have to mock once > (but makes the code slightly less readable) could combine that with adding a local helper with the same name though. While I prefer having no extra code for testing, it's not always possible and a simple getter would be at least save to have.