From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 817A36889E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:13:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 640F325ACF
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:12:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 55D8D25AC2
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:12:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1A8B946064
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:12:51 +0100 (CET)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20201106143059.22047-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <d721d683-65fe-322e-a693-4cce1b35cf5a@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:12:49 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/83.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201106143059.22047-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.101 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [storage.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 storage 1/5] fix #3030: always
 activate volumes in storage_migrate
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:13:22 -0000

On 06.11.20 15:30, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> AFAICT the snapshot activation is not necessary for our plugins at the =
moment,
> but it doesn't really hurt and might be relevant in the future or for e=
xternal
> plugins.
>=20
> Deactivating volumes is up to the caller, because for example, for repl=
ication
> on a running guest, we obviously don't want to deactivate volumes.
>=20
> Suggested-by: Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  PVE/Storage.pm | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>=20
>

applied, thanks!