From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EC6A1FF2C7 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:34:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 179591AD57; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:35:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:34:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Christoph Heiss References: <20240718134905.1177775-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> From: Aaron Lauterer In-Reply-To: <20240718134905.1177775-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.038 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH installer v2 00/17] fix #5536: implement post-(auto-)installation notification mechanism X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" I tested the patch series with the HTTP auto install variant and logged the POST hook request. Overall it works as advertised. Patch 6/17 runs into a problem if the system isn't using secure boot. But I think we should fix that in Proxmox/Install/RunEnv.pm to store it in a way that the JSON stores it not in the form `"secure_boot":""` but rather as `"secure_boot":0`. Patch 11/17 should be dropped, as it will reduce the usefulness of the output to find out why the test failed. The plan here is to switch that to, most likely, pretty_assertions. With this, and the smaller comments on the individual patches, considers this series: Tested-By: Aaron Lauterer Reviewed-By: Aaron Lauterer _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel