From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id EB3A5614F0
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 09:29:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with UTF8SMTP id DA23EE50C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 09:29:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with UTF8SMTPS id 69B53E4FC
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 09:29:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with UTF8SMTP id 2F87343CE6
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 09:29:17 +0100 (CET)
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <57EF5F8B433A6742AD548ABECE78FE48539302@hal9001.straightec.lokal>
 <901006600.10.1605848394705@webmail.proxmox.com>
 <57EF5F8B433A6742AD548ABECE78FE48539304@hal9001.straightec.lokal>
 <0fb3f9c2-0828-2e3e-c8fd-13d7490ee8ba@proxmox.com>
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <d695834c-6608-5c9d-ff6d-de2b08ddd5b2@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 09:29:16 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/83.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0fb3f9c2-0828-2e3e-c8fd-13d7490ee8ba@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.337 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [wikipedia.org]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Improve container backup speed dramatically (factor
 100-1000)
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 08:29:49 -0000

arg, of course i forgot the reference to the rolling hash info...

here it is:
0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_hash