From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8CB9645B0 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:16:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B736731460 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:16:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 4F61F31455 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:16:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 23E2241CD6 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:16:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:16:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:98.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/98.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Aaron Lauterer References: <20220302101249.1137742-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20220302101249.1137742-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.059 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [pve-devel] applied: Re: [PATCH manager] ui: osd: send in/out cmd to currently used node X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 11:16:52 -0000 On 02/03/2022 11:12, Aaron Lauterer wrote: > The in & out commands for OSDs are not node specific and can be run on > any node in the Ceph cluster. By sending them to the node currently used > to access the UI they can still be sent even if the node on which the > OSDs are located is down. > > This helps in a disaster scenario where a node is down. By default Ceph > will mark a downed OSD as out after 10 minutes. This could be too long > in some situations. Running the CLI command to mark the OSD as out > earlier on one of the remaining nodes does work, but if the admin is not > used doing it this way, this adds stress, in a potentially already > stressful situation. > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer > --- > www/manager6/ceph/OSD.js | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > applied, thanks!