From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A04E1FF170 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:53:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8960E2B8F7; Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:53:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:53:03 +0100 From: Gabriel Goller To: Christian Ebner Message-ID: References: <20241119113730.171826-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20241002-35-39f9a6 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.040 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmox-i18n] update Italian translations X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" On 19.11.2024 13:36, Christian Ebner wrote: >On 11/19/24 13:33, Gabriel Goller wrote: >>On 19.11.2024 12:37, Christian Ebner wrote: >>>Signed-off-by: Christian Ebner >>>--- >>>it.po | 126 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------------- >>>1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-) >>> >>>diff --git a/it.po b/it.po >>>index a1a5c48..da5516c 100644 >>>--- a/it.po >>>+++ b/it.po >>>@@ -10837,9 +10802,8 @@ msgid "Sync Schedule" >>>msgstr "Orario Sync" >>> >>>#: proxmox-backup/www/Utils.js:449 >>>-#, fuzzy >>>msgid "Sync job" >>>-msgstr "Sync" >>>+msgstr "" >>> >>>#: pmg-gui/js/LDAPConfig.js:545 >>>msgid "Synchronize" >>>@@ -10981,9 +10945,8 @@ msgid "Tag Style Override" >>>msgstr "Sovrascrittura Stile Etichetta" >>> >>>#: pve-manager/www/manager6/form/ViewSelector.js:36 >>>-#, fuzzy >>>msgid "Tag View" >>>-msgstr "Vista Storage" >>>+msgstr "Visualizzazione Etichetta" >> >>IMO "tag" is fine, etichetta sounds weird in this context. What do you >>think? > >While I agree, the issue is that we do translate `tag` as `etichetta` >already, so either we go with it as is or change the translations >everywhere else. I'd change it everywhere, "etichetta" is *too* italian :) _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel